<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Data &#38; Stuff // Neil Houston &#187; twitter jobs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rasga.co.uk/tag/twitter-jobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rasga.co.uk</link>
	<description>Yeap, data and stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:30:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://rasga.co.uk/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>What will Twitter look like?</title>
		<link>http://rasga.co.uk/2010/02/25/what-will-twitter-look-like/</link>
		<comments>http://rasga.co.uk/2010/02/25/what-will-twitter-look-like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil H</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data visualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monetisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rasga.co.uk/?p=213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lot of people are aware of what Twitter is like as a service, but what do we know about how it looks like internally?  Apart from the fact that it has a nice plush office

I&#8217;ve always been interested in &#8216;Where Twitter Might Go&#8217; &#8211; both from their infrastructure, staffing and the future products/services [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of people are aware of what Twitter is like as a service, but what do we know about how it looks like internally?  Apart from the fact that it has a nice <a href="http://www.decodir.com/2009/11/twitters-new-office-and-headquarters-in-san-francisco/">plush office</a><br />
<a href="http://www.decodir.com/2009/11/twitters-new-office-and-headquarters-in-san-francisco/"><img class="aligncenter" title="Twitter Breakout Area" src="http://www.decodir.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/twitter-new-headquarters-san-francisco-550x366.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="366" /></a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always been interested in &#8216;Where Twitter Might Go&#8217; &#8211; both from their infrastructure, staffing and the future products/services they may be rolling out.  Thanks to Twitter opening up a <a href="http://twitter.com/jobs">job site</a>, we can get a picture as to what they are planning to do in the future.</p>
<p>The obvious is regarding <a href="http://twitter.com/job.html?jvi=oGGfVfwg,Job">monetisation</a>, it&#8217;s taken a while but there are now <a href="http://gigaom.com/2010/02/23/twitter-to-launch-ad-platform-soon/">&#8216;official&#8217; rumours</a> that some form of an &#8216;ad platform&#8217; will be launched at <a href="http://sxsw.com/node/4137">SXSWi</a> next month where Evan Williams, the Twitter CEO will be one of the Keynote speakers.</p>
<p>This is backed up, by the fact they are actively recruiting for product marketing, and software engineers to work on monetisation.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more interesting, to me, is the other jobs on offer.  Especially regarding data analysts, and data visualisation.  Just recently Twitter mentioned that the twittersphere are tweeting at a rate of <a href="http://blog.twitter.com/2010/02/measuring-tweets.html">50,000 times a day</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.twitter.com/2010/02/measuring-tweets.html"><img class="aligncenter" title="Twitter Tweet Count" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_iKd31qdfQM8/S4Li5qDgkEI/AAAAAAAAAdI/8X4N4-_Zd6g/s800/chart-tweets-per-day3.png" alt="" width="534" height="403" /></a></p>
<p>That&#8217;s a lot of data being put out there, a lot of opportunity for text semantics, trend analysis, and harvesting the information.  Which makes sense for Twitter to be after data analysts etc.  Though the fact they are actively moving into the visualisation market is interesting.  Below is a visual they made at the time of the <a href="http://blog.twitter.com/2010/02/super-data.html">Superbowl</a>, tracking both mentions of the Superbowl, and contextual analysis around the brands being mentioned.<br />
<a href="http://blog.twitter.com/2010/02/super-data.html"><img class="aligncenter" title="Twitter Superbowl Analysis" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_iKd31qdfQM8/S3L2yHeAO3I/AAAAAAAAAcc/vEjCNEhtcOk/s800/superbowl_med_final.png" alt="" width="534" height="358" /></a></p>
<p>To me, the combination of their active recruitment in these two areas is an indicator that they may be releasing in the future, a tool that allows for the contextual and semantic analysis of Your Brand, they are slowly rolling out corporate tools (like being able to say who a Tweet was attributed to without having to use ^NH etc)<br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/twitter"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-218" title="Twitter_Attribution" src="http://rasga.co.uk/_wp/wp-content/upload/2010/02/Twitter_Attribution.png" alt="Twitter Attribution" width="461" height="175" /></a></p>
<p>Who knows what the future might look like, I&#8217;ve got my ideas, and got my own side projects!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rasga.co.uk/2010/02/25/what-will-twitter-look-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

